The European Union’s assertive proposal to sanction Israel can be interpreted as not only a message to Jerusalem but also a significant signal to Washington. By taking a line that is considerably tougher than that of the United States, the EU is asserting a more independent and distinct foreign policy on a critical global issue.
For decades, European policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has often operated in the shadow of the United States, which has traditionally been Israel’s main diplomatic protector. The new EU proposal represents a clear break from this pattern, demonstrating a willingness to create a transatlantic divide over Middle East policy.
This move may be intended to pressure the U.S. to adopt a stronger stance itself. By threatening sanctions, the EU could be trying to force Washington’s hand, creating a “good cop, bad cop” dynamic where the U.S. might be compelled to offer Israel a diplomatic off-ramp to avoid the implementation of European measures.
The action also reflects the EU’s ambition to be a global power in its own right, not merely a junior partner to the United States. On issues like climate change and trade, the EU has long carved out its own path. The Israel sanctions proposal suggests it is now more willing to do so in the sensitive arena of international security.
This assertion of strategic autonomy comes with risks, as it could create friction in the transatlantic alliance. However, for many in Brussels, the credibility of the EU’s own foreign policy requires it to act on its stated values, even if it means disagreeing with its most important ally.